| (1)
Number of workers (L)
| (2)
Total product (Q)
| (3)
Average product
(AP= Q/L)
| (4)
Marginal product
(MP=∆Q/∆L)
|
|
|
| -
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 56,7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 51,6
|
|
|
|
| 47,7
|
|
|
|
| 43,4
|
|
|
|
| 39,3
|
|
|
|
| 35,3
|
|
|
|
| 31,4
| -4
|
These total products are reproduced in column 2 of Table 4.2 for each level of labour usage in column 1. Thus, columns 1 and 2 in Table 4.2 define a production function of the form Q - f(L, K), where K=2. In this example, total product (Q) rises with increases in labour up to a point (nine workers) and then declines. While total product does eventually fall as more workers are employed, a manager would not (knowingly) hire additional workers if he knew output would fall. In Table 4.2, for example, a manager can hire either 8 workers or 10 workers to produce 314 units of output. Obviously, the economically efficient amount of labour to hire to produce 314 units is 8 workers.
2. Comprehension check.
Are the following statements true or false? Correct the false ones.
a) Once the level of capital is fixed, changes in output must be accomplished by '
changes in the use of variable inputs.
b) No output can be produced with zero workers.
c) Seven units of labour combined with five units of capital can produce a maximum of
559 units of output.
d) A manager could employ additional workers if he knew output could fall.
e) The economically efficient amount of labour to hire to produce 286 units is eight
workers.